Vendor audit record

Velocell Bio

Website velocellbio.com

Audit slug velocell-bio Audited Auditor agent-research-C

Grade DAvoid — thin evidence

Recent activity: Zero COAs in the last 90 days; latest publication was 463 days ago (~1.3 years stale). Score: D. Score: D. Velocell Bio is a real, accessible peptide vendor — not a fabricated name. The site is brand-new (WHOIS Jul 2025, no Wayback snapshots, brand markets itself as 'a new peptide supplier'). They publish 3 COAs on lab-reports.html from a real third-party lab (Peptide Test, MI). The lab is verifiable as an entity but the COAs lack QR/portal verification, so individual results are not third-party-checkable without an out-of-band email. The 'every batch tested' claim is contradicted by reality: only 3 of ~10+ products have COAs, the latest is ~4 months old, and 2 advertised 'in progress' COAs (MOTS-C, NAD+, due Feb 2025) appear to have never been published. Per the rubric this fits 'D — Token effort: 1-3 stale COAs total ... no lab portal verification' — the 3-COA count is exactly the D-bracket boundary. Not an F because the lab is real and the bottle branding is internally consistent. Not a C because the volume is too low and the staleness too pronounced. The 'no-batch-numbers' red flag is partial: the 3 COAs do carry batch IDs, but no batch IDs are visible on any of the un-tested products in the catalog.

The take

A nine-month-old brand with three stale COAs and seven untested products is not a verifiable program — it is the start of one that stalled.

Velocell Bio looks like a vendor trying to do the right thing, but the program is too new and too thin to evaluate as serious. The domain was registered 2025-07-23 — about nine and a half months before this audit — and the Wayback Machine CDX returns no archives, confirming there is no operating history. The Lab Reports page lists three completed COAs from Peptide Test, a real Michigan-based testing service: SEMA-1 (batch VCB-SEMA-2501), TRZ-2 (batch VCB-TRZ-2501), and RT-3 (batch VCB-RT-2501), all dated January 2025. Two further entries — MOTS-C and NAD+ — are marked 'testing in progress, expected February 2025' and have not materialized in the 15 months since. The catalog runs to roughly ten products; only three carry COAs, which directly contradicts the 'every batch is independently tested' claim. The bottle branding is internally consistent (vendor-controlled product codes match the batch IDs on the COAs), but the COAs are PDF-only with no QR or portal lookup, so even the three reports cannot be re-checked without emailing peptidetest.com directly. Latest COA is 463 days stale at audit time.

  • Strength. Peptide Test is a real third-party Michigan lab, and the vendor-branded vial codes (VCB-SEMA-2501 etc.) match the batch numbers on the COAs, suggesting the vendor controls its own labeling rather than reselling generic stock.
  • Concern. Only 3 of roughly 10+ catalogued products have any COA at all, the two 'in-progress' reports promised for February 2025 never appeared, and the latest report is 463 days old.

COA program

Public COA page Yes
Total COAs found 3
Date range 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
Cadence 0 COAs in the last 90 days — latest publication was 463 days before audit.
"Every batch" claimed? Yes
Volume vs. claim Site claims 'Every batch is independently tested by third-party laboratories using HPLC and mass spectrometry. We publish full Certificates of Analysis (COAs) on our Lab Reports page.' Reality: the Lab Reports page lists only 3 completed COAs (SEMA-1 batch VCB-SEMA-2501, TRZ-2 batch VCB-TRZ-2501, RT-3 batch VCB-RT-2501, all dated January 2025) plus 2 entries marked 'testing in progress' (MOTS-C, NAD+) with 'expected February 2025' that never materialized into published COAs. Vendor sells ~10+ products but only 3 have COAs. The 'every batch tested' claim is therefore contradicted by the catalog-vs-COA gap and by the fact that the latest published COA (~Jan 2025) is now ~4 months stale at audit time.

Issuing labs & verifiability

  • Peptide Test (Michigan) Unverifiable — Peptide Test is a real Michigan-based peptide testing service operating at peptidetest.com. They describe themselves as performing tests at a partner lab whose scientists do FDA-regulated pharmaceutical QC, with method validation per USP/NF and use HPLC + UV. The lab is a verifiable third party (independent of the vendor), but Velocell's COAs are PDF-only — no QR code, no portal lookup ID, no signed verification mechanism. To independently re-check a Velocell COA, a researcher would have to email peptidetest.com directly. ISO 17025 alignment is claimed by Velocell ('Their methods are validated according to USP') but not confirmed via an accreditation certificate.

Authenticity

Bottle images match brand? Yes — branded bottle matches
Bottle evidence Product pages show Velocell-branded vials with proprietary product codes (e.g., 'SEMA-1 Semaglutide Research Compound Vial', 'TRZ-2 Tirzepatide Research Compound Vial'). The branding scheme (compound prefix + numeric code) is consistent across the catalog and matches the batch-number format on COAs (VCB-SEMA-2501 etc.), suggesting the vendor controls its own labeling rather than reselling generic stock vials.
COA template shared with other vendors? No

Red flags

unverifiable-labno-batch-numbers

Domain history

Site accessible at audit time Yes
First Wayback snapshot
Approximate domain age ~9.5 months — WHOIS creation 2025-07-23. No Wayback Machine snapshots returned by the CDX API (empty result for velocellbio.com), confirming the site is too new to have been archived.

Evidence trail